Waterfox did solve (not totally but pretty close) the performance issues that i've been having with firefox and it's as costumizable as the later.

It really baffles my mind how does chromium and other engines want to be taken serious with only 4 basic buttons on it's toolbar - it's an insult to any user. So i started to test every other browser i could get my hands on for a week or so ago and it just confirmed that i can't work properly with a browser that, for instance, doesn't let me, fully, natively, and in a simple way, costumize the toolbars.

Anyway, i've been having problems with very slow or irresponsive firefox. We have over 886 user agents for Waterfox which you can browse and explore. I've been using mozilla/firefox since its inception.

Pros: - as good as firefox, with better performance.Ĭons: - still some performance issues in my own setup (it may have to do with the gecko engine, not waterfox's fault).īottom Line: In my own experience and needs of productivity, Firefox's costumization options and overall layout far exceeds its lack of performance in comparison to other browsers.

Waterfox classic 2020